How to lift 2.5 million people out of poverty…..

I’ve spent some of today reading the Social Metric Commission’s report on poverty, which puts the number of people in poverty in the U.K. at 22% of the population, or 14.2 million people.

The report developed a new way of measuring poverty which takes account of the following:

  • material resources – i.e. how much debt and savings people have to tide them over in hard times.
  • inescapable costs – such as the higher costs associated with being disabled or child care.
  • homelessness – the report automatically defines anyone sleeping rough as being in poverty.

This should give a more valid measurement of the numbers of people in poverty than the ‘Households Below Average Income Survey‘ which only uses household income to determine ‘households on low relative income*’, as factoring in debt or savings will respectively push or pull certain households out of poverty, and factoring in the hundreds of thousands of households which face unusually high costs (e.g. of childcare for dual earner households with young children and no family support) would likewise push a few more households into poverty.

Once all of the above additional costs and resources are factored in, the number of people in poverty in the UK is 14.2 million people, or 22% of the UK population  – that’s the number which now fall below the Commission’s new poverty line, which is all those who fall below 55% of median average income

WTF – All those who fall below 55% of median income?

If the 55% threshold sounds a little arbitrary, that’s because it is!

Despite the fact that the UK government uses 60% of median income as its poverty threshold, the Commission decided this itself was just an arbitrary decision (the EU uses 50%), which then gave it free reign to set it’s own ‘arbitrary bench mark’.

They give three reasons for the new 55% threshold:

  • It’s an arbitrary decision whatever the threshold
  • They want to be able to easily communicate it (55% isn’t that memorable?!?)
  • They wanted a figure that wasn’t too far off existing measurements.

And surprise, surprise, the poverty rate that the commission has ‘uncovered’ which is basically exactly the same figure you can find in the government’s most recent ‘Households Below Average Income’ survey, which uses a 60% threshold.

If the commission had taken the 60% threshold, it would have put a further 2.5 million people in poverty, to give a total figure of 16.5 million, or 25% of the population.

It seems they’ve modified the threshold to make the figures look more acceptable. I mean, I guess after you’ve spent more than a year figuring out a more accurate way to measure poverty, it’d be a shame if the government just flat-out rejected your measurement, wouldn’t it now!

In their defence they say it’s just a bench mark, whatever threshold you use.

350 thoughts on “How to lift 2.5 million people out of poverty…..”

  1. Hello, I believe your blog could possibly be having internet browser compatibility issues. Whenever I look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening in I.E., it’s got some overlapping issues. I merely wanted to give you a quick heads up! Aside from that, excellent blog!

  2. In January pattern year, wee ieqidm flatten ill. It’s okay, condign a submissive buy generic cialis online, which passed in five days. But the temperature without warning returned away the conclude of the month: the thermometer showed 36. The boy was urgently hospitalized with fever and convulsions. A few hours later, three-year-old Yegor stopped breathing – he flatten into a coma. With the better of a ventilator and a tracheostomy, the doctors resumed the beget of the lungs, but oxygen starvation struck the brain. The kid has lost the whole shebang that he managed to learn in three years. The diagnosis is posthypoxic encyphalopathy.

  3. Pingback:
  4. Our doctor cerebration that Dad was it is possible that uniform better than Mom in this situation. Stricter, more persistent, when one pleases not deplore at intervals again when you want to perform inconsolable viagra online. Well, I wanted to send my helpmate a break.
    I dog-tired a little exceeding a month in the all-out take care of part and two and a half months in the bone marrow remove unit. There I became a giver in compensation my son. I’m ready I was competent to stop him. I was the only human beings in both departments, but my parents were already there. That is, a inhibit in the repulse with a sprog is no longer a rarity.

  5. Commonly, it was thitherto empiric that required malar merely best part of the country to buy cialis online reviews in wider fluctuations, but contemporary charge symptoms that multifarious youngРІ Complete is an seditious Counterbalance Harding ED mobilization; I purple this mechanism last will and testament most you to make fresh whatРІs insideРІ Lems In return ED While Are Digital To Lymphocyte Shagging Acuity And Tonsillar Hypertrophy. sildenafil generic name Zxetsv liexdx

  6. To abbreviate the consequences of hemorrhages, the canadian pharmacies Rudnev Clinical Center for Mamma and Child needs a ventriculoscopic device. It wishes preserve from death and control the merciless consequences of IVH (neurological disorders) in hundreds and thousands of newborn babies in our region. Moreover, in some cases it on make it doable to do without evade surgery, which entails uncountable risks and complications and requires additional operations!

  7. Hi there, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam comments? If so how do you reduce it, any plugin or anything you can recommend? I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any support is very much appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *